routing Campus Boulevard Press article in the Aachener Zeitung on 2009-08-25
Considerable dispute exists, the route to the campus in Melaten Boulevards. Which one you prefer
is protected and you think the Rabental this enough?
The Aachener Zeitung has contacted the environmental spokesmen of the parties: CDU #
Ferdinand Corsten From an environmental perspective, the answer is clear. The environmental report shows that Option 3 - caused the least interference - with the largest distance between Rabental. In the overall consideration of policy and administration but come to the medium variant, which is better for the Rabental than the initial version. The final decision will be made after weighing the public input in the development plan process.
SPD # Heike Wolf RWTH The planned campus expansion is a truly important project for the city of Aachen. But the fears of local residents should be taken seriously. Therefore, in coordination with the construction and inspection and potential investors dringend geprüft werden , ob und wie eine Änderung der Trassenführung möglich ist , um die Auswirkungen für das Rabental als Naherholungsgebiet gering zu halten .
Die Grünen # Monika Kuck Der Campus Melaten ist ein ehrgeiziges und wichtiges Projekt für Aachen . Der Verlauf der inneren Erschließung ist allerdings zum Rabental hin nicht gut gelöst . Würde man zum Beispiel den Boulevardbogen enger führen , könnte das Rabental als wichtiges und schönes Naherholungsgebiet auch für den neuen Campus intakt erhalten bleiben , und gleichzeitig wäre auch die Erschütterungsproblematik für bestehende Spitzenforschung gelöst .
FDP # Peter Blum After extensive discussion on 28 May in the Environment Committee, the majority of Type 2, with the votes of the FDP decided. Another route of either would affect the people more in other areas or the campus project risk Melaten whole. We therefore see no reason to reconsider our opinion.
The Left # Dirk Tentler available for the routing options available to protect the Rabental. A modified version 2 (half brace with developers from the north and turning area) and variant 4 (Path in Physics Institute) are examined. Short term should be a moratorium to be coordinated through the route of Rabental across party lines.
UWG # Martin Haase environmental terms, would be a useful development by only a clip of the version 2 of the north, with a turning area. Without the physical institute, would offer a path to guide the variant fourth In each case the residents are immediately in all future plans include effective.
OJ # Alfred Koch The route of the campus Melaten we are environmentally sound for the solution, unless special traffic problems arise. However, we are opposed to comprehensive re-report be obtained.
FWG # Hans Bomble In its submission to the decision of the traffic management of both the staff responsible for planning office and the administration argued convincingly that the variant 2 in the consideration of all advantages and disadvantages of the best presents. Variant 3 (Rabental) would lead to considerable additional expenditure. In addition, the air quality in this area would deteriorate significantly.
# source: Aachener Zeitung on 2009-08-25
